top tags

Posts tagged health care


Apr 4, 2014
@ 5:38 pm

~ Permalink
1,773 notes

beingliberal:

Senator Ted Cruz asked - 60,000 people answeredI bet that the Social Media manager of Senator Ted Cruz FB page is now fighting the urge to delete this “Quick Poll” … The damage can’t be undone - the best collection of pro-Obamacare comments online!

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)


Mar 7, 2014
@ 5:38 pm

~ Permalink
40,590 notes

theonetruenators:

fajazo:

grrspit:

zenodotus5:

cognitivedissonance:

brooklynmutt:

Now on your restaurant bill: Obamacare fee

I’m fine with this. If it means said place is complying with the ACA instead of trying to get around it by kicking their employees on to the exchanges via cutting hours to part-time, great. Here’s two dimes.

Twenty cents for a bill of over $20. So that employees get health insurance. This is a fucking ADVERTISEMENT for Obamacare.

^^^
No lie. 

YESSSSS

OH BOY TWENTY FUCKING CENTS SO SOMEONE ELSE DOESN’T FUCKING DIE IN THE STRETS BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE HEALTHCARE WHAT THE FUCK IM PROTESTING IM SCREAMING IM GONNA WRITE SHITTY ARTICLES SOMEONE CHANGE MY FUCKING DIAPER

I will gladly pay those extra two dimes to help a family get regular checkups. Since you wanted to go there douchey tea party business owner, should we talk about the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM?

Should we talk about the nearly $8 trillion the United States has spent on defense since the September 11th attacks? Should we mention that national security accounts for $0.25 of every dollar the federal government spent in 2013? 

theonetruenators:

fajazo:

grrspit:

zenodotus5:

cognitivedissonance:

brooklynmutt:

Now on your restaurant bill: Obamacare fee

I’m fine with this. If it means said place is complying with the ACA instead of trying to get around it by kicking their employees on to the exchanges via cutting hours to part-time, great. Here’s two dimes.

Twenty cents for a bill of over $20. So that employees get health insurance. This is a fucking ADVERTISEMENT for Obamacare.

^^^

No lie. 

YESSSSS

OH BOY TWENTY FUCKING CENTS SO SOMEONE ELSE DOESN’T FUCKING DIE IN THE STRETS BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE HEALTHCARE WHAT THE FUCK IM PROTESTING IM SCREAMING IM GONNA WRITE SHITTY ARTICLES SOMEONE CHANGE MY FUCKING DIAPER

I will gladly pay those extra two dimes to help a family get regular checkups. Since you wanted to go there douchey tea party business owner, should we talk about the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM?

President's Proposed Discretionary Spending (Fiscal Year 2014)

Should we talk about the nearly $8 trillion the United States has spent on defense since the September 11th attacks? Should we mention that national security accounts for $0.25 of every dollar the federal government spent in 2013? 

(via carbonchaos)


Mar 3, 2014
@ 6:49 pm

~ Permalink
505 notes

During a Republican primary debate in the last presidential election cycle, there was a dispiriting moment in which tea party audience members cheered at the idea that a comatose uninsured American — unable to afford health insurance — would be left to die. That infamous outburst, among others, has prompted GOP bigwigs to try to cut back on primary season debates, hoping to limit appearances that might expose the party’s baser impulses. But that mean-spirited and contemptuous attitude toward the sick is alive and well in the Grand Old Party, as its maniacal (and futile) resistance to Obamacare has made clear. Now, one Republican politician is pushing that callousness to new lows: He wants to bar the uninsured from hospital emergency rooms.

GOP WOULD BAR POOR FROM HEALTH CARE ALTOGETHER (via azspot)

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)


Jan 24, 2014
@ 9:46 am

~ Permalink
163,578 notes

letterstomycountry:

kirkwa:

And This Is Why You Shouldn’t Get Sick In America

Many believe that the US healthcare system is the best in the world. Not so according to the World Health Organization’s ranking of the world’s health systems. The US doesn’t even rank in the top 25. It ranks 37th and is the most expensive in the world. I would argue that even if we had the best healthcare system in the world, what good is it, if no one can afford to access it.

Most companies are buying 60/40-policys for their employees these days, but even if you are lucky enough to have good insurance with 80/20-policy coverage, that 20 percent your responsible for can drive you right into bankruptcy as easily as the 60-40 policy given the cost of healthcare.

Insurance cost have been going up dramatically in the last two decades, long before the new Affordable Healthcare Act has taken affect, in some cases as much as 35% per year.

But have you noticed the latest trick the insurance companies have roll out?

Yes, Higher Deductible… most averaging $5,000 per year, per person, but I have seen some as high as $10,000 per year. For those of you that are wondering, this tactic is specifically designed too stop you from using your insurance. It reduces the insurance companies out of pocket liability by shift costs onto consumers, especially those dealing with chronic illness such as diabetes and arthritis. Consequently, because consumers can’t afford the deductible they will avoid necessary care to save money.

Although insurance companies are a problem, the real crocks is the healthcare system it self. A corrupt and bloated system desperately in need of reform!

LTMC: Man.  Canadians have cheap healthcare, but they must be dropping like flies with all that socialized medicine.  

Wait a minute…

(via other-stuff)


Jan 10, 2014
@ 9:13 am

~ Permalink
11 notes

unitedspaniard:

Why Are American Health Care Costs So High?


Nov 25, 2013
@ 11:00 am

~ Permalink
129 notes

Busted! Health Insurers Secretly Spent Huge To Defeat Health Care Reform While Pretending To Support Obamacare - Forbes »

jilli1205:

other-stuff:

According to the National Journal’s Influence Alley, at the very same time the American Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)—the health insurance industry super lobby—was cutting a deal with the White House leading to its stated support of the proposed Obamacare legislation, they were secretly funneling huge amounts money to the Chamber of Commerce to be spent on advertising designed to convince the public that the legislation should be defeated.

How much money?

A stunning $102.4 million spent over just 15 months.

While one would not think that so much money could be spent in secret, AHIP pulled it off by utilizing a completely legal process of funneling the cash to the Chamber under the radar while putting the giant expenditure on their books under the simple heading of ‘advocacy’.

So, why would AHIP try to secretly destroy a legislative scheme that would drive millions of new customers into their arms thanks to the mandated insurance provisions?

According to Neera Tanden, who served as the senior advisor for health reform at the Department of Health and Human Services and was a member of the Obama White House health reform team, it was all about the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)—the provision of the ACA that not only requires the health insurance companies to spend 80 percent of your premium dollars on actual health care expenditures, but further requires that they refund to their customers any amounts they fail to spend as required by the MLR.

This story is not new, but I mostly missed it when it first came out.

J: Gee-whiz and gee-whilickers, imagine that.

For-profit health care answers to shareholders not to consumers. This seems like such an obvious statement but thinking about it colors the way I think about a lot of things. Whose interests does a company have in mind when they deny coverage for preexisting conditions or put lifetime caps on coverage? Who profits?

(via kp777)


Nov 18, 2013
@ 9:54 pm

~ Permalink
46,544 notes

rrrick:

liberalsarecool:

We are so behind.

The metric system baffles us. Of course we are behind.

In rebuttal, freedom

rrrick:

liberalsarecool:

We are so behind.

The metric system baffles us. Of course we are behind.

In rebuttal, freedom


Oct 23, 2013
@ 10:37 pm

~ Permalink
11,849 notes

plannedparenthood:

Now health insurance plans are required to cover screenings and counseling for domestic violence as a preventive health benefit for women. Thanks, Obamacare!

plannedparenthood:

Now health insurance plans are required to cover screenings and counseling for domestic violence as a preventive health benefit for women. Thanks, Obamacare!

(via dl-44)


Oct 7, 2013
@ 8:40 pm

~ Permalink
70,318 notes

sidzthekillahhh:

Yup

sidzthekillahhh:

Yup

(Source: enjoyceinglife, via akapearlofagirl)


Jul 23, 2013
@ 2:16 pm

~ Permalink
31,629 notes

Other Stuff: my-feminism: In the Netherlands, abortion is freely available on... »

my-feminism:

In the Netherlands, abortion is freely available on demand. Yet the Netherlands boasts the lowest abortion rate in the world, about 6 abortions per 1000 women per year, and the complication and death rates for abortion are miniscule. How do they do it? First of all, contraception is widely available and free — it’s covered by the national health insurance plan. Holland also carries out extensive public education on contraception, family planning, and sexuality. An ethic of personal responsibility for one’s sexual activity is strongly promoted. Of course, some people say that teaching kids about sex and contraception will only encourage them to have lots of sex. But Dutch teenagers tend to have less frequent sex, starting at an older age, than American teenagers, and the In the Netherlands, abortion is freely available on demand. Yet the Netherlands boasts the lowest abortion rate in the world, about 6 abortions per 1000 women per year, and the complication and death rates for abortion are miniscule. How do they do it? First of all, contraception is widely available and free — it’s covered by the national health insurance plan. Holland also carries out extensive public education on contraception, family planning, and sexuality. An ethic of personal responsibility for one’s sexual activity is strongly promoted. Of course, some people say that teaching kids about sex and contraception will only encourage them to have lots of sex. But Dutch teenagers tend to have less frequent sex, starting at an older age, than American teenagers, and the Dutch teenage pregnancy rate is 9 times lower than in the U.S.

Oh Holland, now you’re being a show-off.


Jun 6, 2013
@ 3:41 pm

~ Permalink
2,676 notes

peachsss:

did-you-kno:

Source

Nope, nothing to see here. Nothing wrong at all.

When profit motive meets health care… what could possibly go wrong?

(via)

peachsss:

did-you-kno:

Source

Nope, nothing to see here. Nothing wrong at all.

When profit motive meets health care… what could possibly go wrong?

health care waste 2009

(via)

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)


Aug 18, 2012
@ 11:47 pm

~ Permalink
36 notes

romney2012:

Stephanie Cutter: Medicare Whiteboard

Stephanie Cutter breaks down how the Romney-Ryan plan will end Medicare as we know it, turning it into a voucher system and making seniors pay up to $6,400 more. She also shares how President Obama is already strengthening Medicare and helping seniors save money.

Share it: http://OFA.BO/BfgKF4
Tweet it: http://OFA.BO/M7sBAW
Tumble it: http://OFA.BO/FMhBim

Romney/Ryan want to add more profit motive into the healthcare industry. What could go wrong?

(Source: jeipeuri, via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)


Jun 28, 2012
@ 2:20 pm

~ Permalink
331 notes

other-stuff:

savagemike:

jasencomstock:

reuters:

Religious leaders lay on the ground and pray over a bible and a copy of the verdict on President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare overhaul law outside the Supreme Court in Washington June 28, 2012. 
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama’s healthcare law on Thursday in an election-year triumph for him and fellow Democrats and a stinging setback for Republican opponents of the most sweeping overhaul of the unwieldy U.S. healthcare system in about a half century. [REUTERS/Jason Reed]
PHOTOS: Supreme Court rules on Affordable Care Act

Almost as ridic as when Christians were praying at the gold bull statue on Wall St. in 2008.

So they’re praying for more poor people to die? 
Remember, kids:

“It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven. ” - The ol’ J.C. himself (Matthew 19:24)


- again

So they’re praying for more poor people to die? 

I do not understand, how did we get to this? Who are these people and how do they have the guts to show their heads in public?

Christians praying to restrict access to health care?

other-stuff:

savagemike:

jasencomstock:

reuters:

Religious leaders lay on the ground and pray over a bible and a copy of the verdict on President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare overhaul law outside the Supreme Court in Washington June 28, 2012. 

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama’s healthcare law on Thursday in an election-year triumph for him and fellow Democrats and a stinging setback for Republican opponents of the most sweeping overhaul of the unwieldy U.S. healthcare system in about a half century. [REUTERS/Jason Reed]

PHOTOS: Supreme Court rules on Affordable Care Act

Almost as ridic as when Christians were praying at the gold bull statue on Wall St. in 2008.

So they’re praying for more poor people to die? 

Remember, kids:

“It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven. ” - The ol’ J.C. himself (Matthew 19:24)

- again

So they’re praying for more poor people to die? 

I do not understand, how did we get to this? Who are these people and how do they have the guts to show their heads in public?

Christians praying to restrict access to health care?


Jun 28, 2012
@ 9:43 am

~ Permalink
12 notes

The Founding Fathers & Mandates

From the user comments: Ganon
Reply #9
Jun. 28, 2012 - 10:20 AM EST

Worth re-posting now:

There’s a major problem with the line of argument that mandates are unconstitutional: It just isn’t true. The founding fathers, it turns out, passed several mandates of their own. In 1790, the very first Congress—which incidentally included 20 framers—passed a law that included a mandate: namely, a requirement that ship owners buy medical insurance for their seamen. This law was then signed by another framer: President George Washington. That’s right, the father of our country had no difficulty imposing a health insurance mandate.

That’s not all. In 1792, a Congress with 17 framers passed another statute that required all able-bodied men to buy firearms. Yes, we used to have not only a right to bear arms, but a federal duty to buy them. Four framers voted against this bill, but the others did not, and it was also signed by Washington. Some tried to repeal this gun purchase mandate on the grounds it was too onerous, but only one framer voted to repeal it.

Six years later, in 1798, Congress addressed the problem that the employer mandate to buy medical insurance for seamen covered drugs and physician services but not hospital stays. And you know what this Congress, with five framers serving in it, did? It enacted a federal law requiring the seamen to buy hospital insurance for themselves. That’s right, Congress enacted an individual mandate requiring the purchase of health insurance. And this act was signed by another founder, President John Adams.

Not only did most framers support these federal mandates to buy firearms and health insurance, but there is no evidence that any of the few framers who voted against these mandates ever objected on constitutional grounds.

Apr 9, 2012
@ 8:29 am

~ Permalink
8 notes

(Source: thepoliticallyincorrectgroup, via kp777)


 

 


* If you own anything I posted and don't want it here, or if I didn't credit you properly let me know and I'll happily remove or edit it.