top tags

Posts tagged climate change


Feb 26, 2014
@ 2:37 pm

~ Permalink
4 notes

Is Lovelock a Seer and World Catastrophe Inevitable? (Update) »

kp777:

Read more.

Planet Earth as Gaia is indifferent to the plight of humanity. But let’s hope Lovelock is uncharacteristically wrong that mass migrations and wars are inevitable, for all our sakes.



Jan 2, 2014
@ 2:27 pm

~ Permalink
4,991 notes

The Donald’s contribution to global dumbass levels is alarming.

The Donald’s contribution to global dumbass levels is alarming.


Nov 21, 2013
@ 10:54 am

~ Permalink
2,372 notes

redshift-13:

sagansense:

This is what the earth will look like when the ice melts.

via buzzfeed

Nothing to see here, folks.  Let’s all keep driving, shopping, consuming, wasting, and doing everything as if we were only visitors to the planet.

think-progress:

Amazing gifs show what rising sea level will do to your favorite cities and  landmarks.

nothing to see here, move along


Oct 23, 2013
@ 7:59 am

~ Permalink
886 notes

grett:

global warming by benbenbenbenben on Flickr.

grett:

global warming by benbenbenbenben on Flickr.

(via poetic-bullshit)


Aug 12, 2013
@ 1:09 am

~ Permalink
1,195 notes

♪ …and I feel fine… ♪

♪ …and I feel fine… ♪

(Source: noam-chomsky, via mommapolitico)


Jul 22, 2013
@ 3:17 pm

~ Permalink
175 notes

Ice-Free Arctic Pinpointed 40 Years Ahead

liberalsarecool:

LONDON—People have been warning about an ice-free Arctic ocean for years. But Jiping Liu, an atmospheric scientist at the State University of New York in Albany in the US and colleagues have gone one better.

They predict that the Arctic Ocean will be effectively free of ice for the first time in the month of September between 2054 and 2058.

File under: f*ck

I didn’t think I’d see the day when freeze hells over, but I may.


Jul 11, 2013
@ 11:44 am

~ Permalink
71 notes

Why the City of Miami Is Doomed to Drown »

Sea-level rise is not a hypothetical disaster. It is a physical fact of life on a warming planet, the basic dynamics of which even a child can understand: Heat melts ice. Since the 1920s, the global average sea level has risen about nine inches, mostly from the thermal expansion of the ocean water. But thanks to our 200-year-long fossil-fuel binge, the great ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are starting to melt rapidly now, causing the rate of sea-level rise to grow exponentially. The latest research, including an assessment by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, suggests that sea level could rise more than six feet by the end of the century. James Hansen, the godfather of global-warming science, has argued that it could increase as high as 16 feet by then – and Wanless believes that it could continue rising a foot each decade after that. “With six feet of sea-level rise, South Florida is toast,” says Tom Gustafson, a former Florida speaker of the House and a climate-change-policy advocate. Even if we cut carbon pollution overnight, it won’t save us. Ohio State glaciologist Jason Box has said he believes we already have 70 feet of sea-level rise baked into the system.


May 17, 2013
@ 9:04 am

~ Permalink
6 notes

97.1% of 4000 climate science papers in 20 years accept Anthropogenic Global Warming, 0.7% doubt it. »

divineirony:

Abstract

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors’ self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.

Scientific papers accepting human caused global warming:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Scientific papers doubting:

XXX



Apr 8, 2013
@ 5:06 pm

~ Permalink
508 notes

think-progress:

Amazing gifs show what rising sea level will do to your favorite cities and  landmarks.

think-progress:

Amazing gifs show what rising sea level will do to your favorite cities and  landmarks.


Dec 19, 2012
@ 9:40 am

~ Permalink
250 notes

There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks, when they don’t publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues, when they have to manipulate the data to support their point, then what they’re doing isn’t science.

Climate Change Denial: Why don’t they publish scientific papers? (via yellek)

(via divineirony)


Nov 27, 2012
@ 11:02 pm

~ Permalink
324 notes

In the Republican double-plus good bizarro world this makes perfect sense.

In the Republican double-plus good bizarro world this makes perfect sense.

(Source: , via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)


Nov 26, 2012
@ 6:36 pm

~ Permalink
1,273 notes

theatlantic:

5 Charts About Climate Change That Should Have You Very, Very Worried

[Images: World Bank, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences]


Sorry kids… your parents didn’t give enough of a shit.

(via sarahlee310)


Nov 25, 2012
@ 9:15 am

~ Permalink
55 notes

tart-pastry:

Would we, 50, 100, or 200 years from now, have to snorkel to see the Statue of Liberty? Would skyscrapers arise out of downtown Scarsdale?
Would New York City have to be relocated, “the way Torcello was moved to Venice, stone by stone.”

tart-pastry:

Would we, 50, 100, or 200 years from now, have to snorkel to see the Statue of Liberty? Would skyscrapers arise out of downtown Scarsdale?

Would New York City have to be relocated, “the way Torcello was moved to Venice, stone by stone.”

(via tart-pastry)


 

 


* If you own anything I posted and don't want it here, or if I didn't credit you properly let me know and I'll happily remove or edit it.